Charles Darwin's 'On the Origin of Species' voted most influential book

'A Venerable Orang-outang,' a caricature of Charles Darwin as an ape published in The Hornet, a satirical magazine, sometime in 1871. (Wikipedia)

For Christians, the Holy Bible—which teaches that God created man and woman to serve as His stewards on Earth—is their most treasured book.

Majority of voters in a recent online poll, however, chose the controversial book of English geologist Charles Darwin, "On the Origin of Species," as the piece of literature that influenced them the most.

It was not indicated whether the Bible was included in the list of books that the public were made to pick their choice.

Darwin's book, published in 1859 and laid the foundation for evolutionary biology, won by a landslide in a survey organised by The Academic Book of the Future project, receiving a quarter of the votes submitted by the public.

The book, which until now remains to be the subject of criticism especially among creationists, went up against 20 other pieces of literature chosen by a panel of experts.

Alan Staton, head of marketing at the Booksellers Association in the United Kingdom, said the experts really expected Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" to be popular among readers, given its tremendous impact on how human beings think of their origins.

"It's not in the least surprising, and completely right, that 'On the Origin of Species' won. No work has so fundamentally changed the way we think about our very being and the world around us," Staton said, as quoted by CNN.

Voted in second place was the political pamphlet "The Communist Manifesto" by philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, published in 1848 to present the problems with capitalism and the merits of communism.

In third place was the literary masterpiece "The Complete Works of William Shakespeare."

Neil Smyth, senior librarian of the Faculty of Arts, University of Nottingham Literary, said voters were really made to choose among a wide variety of books, ranging from scientific ones to those tackling feminism.

"It is important that the list includes titles that might not be considered by some to be academic," Smyth said.

"Shakespeare and Orwell are available in academic libraries. They are read by academic staff and students, and influence ideas for the academic books of the future," he added.

The online survey was organised in line with the Academic Book Week, which explored how scholarly works in the arts and humanities will be produced, read, and preserved in the coming years.

related articles
One in three US adults do not believe in evolution, says new survey

One in three US adults do not believe in evolution, says new survey

More non-religious people believe in conflict between faith and science than religious people, Pew survey shows
More non-religious people believe in conflict between faith and science than religious people, Pew survey shows

More non-religious people believe in conflict between faith and science than religious people, Pew survey shows

News
President Trump's Arctic love affair
President Trump's Arctic love affair

Surely an ally should not be presented with a take it or leave it poke in the eye?

Bradford Cathedral to host launch of 2025 Cathedrals Cycle Relay in UK City of Culture Year
Bradford Cathedral to host launch of 2025 Cathedrals Cycle Relay in UK City of Culture Year

The third national Cathedrals Cycle Relay (CCR) is set to launch on 24 May 2025 from Bradford Cathedral, coinciding with Bradford’s year as the UK City of Culture.

Megachurch pastor criticises Disney's ‘Snow White’ remake for abandoning biblical themes
Megachurch pastor criticises Disney's ‘Snow White’ remake for abandoning biblical themes

Harvest pastor Greg Laurie has criticised Disney’s live-action remake of ‘Snow White’ for stripping away what he sees as its original gospel-centred message. 

US warns UK over free speech, citing pro-lifer's prosecution
US warns UK over free speech, citing pro-lifer's prosecution

The US state department has issued a statement saying it is "concerned about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom" and that it is "monitoring" the case of a pro-life woman prosecuted for holding a sign offering help within an abortion clinic "buffer zone".