Secularists accuse Church of England of schools 'land grab'

State schools are to become academies. Pixabay

Secular campaigners have hit out at the Church of England over its plans to take over four non-religious schools in the North of England.

The move is part of the government's plans to turn all state schools into academies in a bid to raise standards.

The Diocese of Newcastle is to set up a multi-academy trust (MAT) comprising five schools, only one of which is a Church of England school.

According to Schools Week, it says the ethos of the secular schools will be protected. However, the National Secular Society has described it as a "deeply anti-secular development".

Stephen Evans, the society's campaigns director, said: "If this MAT goes ahead it's hard to see how the non-religious schools within it can realistically be protected from an encroaching religious ethos, particularly if the most senior people in the trust are all advancing the interests of the Church."

article,article,article,article,article Related

A spokesman for the diocese said each school's governing body would be tasked with protecting its current ethos.

Evans also raised the issue of land ownership. The NSS said in its draft submission to the education select committee's inquiry into MATs: "In many cases public land will be transferred from local authorities and placed under control of the local diocese for 125 years, and, given the permission of the secretary of state, the church could use it however it likes.

"We regard this as a deeply anti-secular development and we urge the committee to raise the democratic deficit of this potential 'land grab' with the department."

However, the diocesan spokesperson said: "As with any academisation of non-church schools, the land will transfer to the trust company.

"Such land could not be sold without secretary of state consent and would be likely to be subject to certain conditions such as reinvestment into educational purposes.

"The trust will be a charitable company so any decisions taken must be in accordance with the charitable objects of the company."

related articles
Abolish religious assemblies in schools, says new report

Abolish religious assemblies in schools, says new report

Evangelical \'extremists\'? How new government plans threaten Christian freedom
Evangelical 'extremists'? How new government plans threaten Christian freedom

Evangelical 'extremists'? How new government plans threaten Christian freedom

Leading secularists and Christians join forces to defend free speech
Leading secularists and Christians join forces to defend free speech

Leading secularists and Christians join forces to defend free speech

Christianity invented human rights. Secularists need to remember that
Christianity invented human rights. Secularists need to remember that

Christianity invented human rights. Secularists need to remember that

After the Brussels attacks we need more religion not less
After the Brussels attacks we need more religion not less

After the Brussels attacks we need more religion not less

News
How modern science owes its existence to Christian theology
How modern science owes its existence to Christian theology

Some people think that you have to choose between science and religion, but that is not the case. This is the story …

US religious groups challenge new immigrant enforcement policies
US religious groups challenge new immigrant enforcement policies

A United States Federal Judge has granted an injunction that will prevent immigration agents from carrying out operations in places of worship after a group of religious organisations launched a lawsuit against the Trump administration over new enforcement policies.

Gyles Brandreth joins campaign to end avoidable sight loss
Gyles Brandreth joins campaign to end avoidable sight loss

Gyles Brandreth has thrown his support behind CBM UK’s campaign to end avoidable sight loss.

Church leaders call for 'rethink' of school closures in Ramadan
Church leaders call for 'rethink' of school closures in Ramadan

“We urge the governors of the affected states to reconsider this decision and explore alternative arrangements that respect the rights and freedoms of all citizens.”