U.S. forces get green light to attack ISIS fighters in Afghanistan; critics ask: Why only now?

US soldiers on patrol in Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan. Reuters

U.S. military forces are now authorised to go on offensive against Islamic State (ISIS) fighters in Afghanistan.

The change in the rules of engagement for U.S. forces comes after the U.S. State Department designated ISIS-K (ISIS-Khorasan) in Afghanistan and Pakistan as a foreign terror organisation last week, CNN reported, citing U.S. defence officials.

ISIS-K is reportedly the ISIS branch in Afghanistan and Pakistan that is believed to be responsible for suicide and small-arms attacks and kidnappings, targeting civilians and Afghan government officials.

"The change now means that U.S. forces can actively pursue ISIS elements and attack them as a threat to the United States. Previous rules of engagement required ISIS elements to first pose a threat to U.S. forces in the area or to be pursued as part of a specific counterterrorism mission," U.S. officials said.

"The consequence of the State Department designation is that there is a prohibition against knowingly providing, or attempting or conspiring to provide, material support or resources to this organisation,'' they added.

The officials said the extended group, who has pledged allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was formed a year ago. They mainly include individuals who defected from Tehrik-e Taliban (TTP) and Afghan Taliban. It is led by Hafez Saeed Khan, a former member of the TTP.

The recent development, however, did not sit well with some officials of the government.

Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, slammed the White House for not changing the rules of engagement sooner, CNN said.

"It shouldn't have taken a year for the White House to identify ISIS as a threat in Afghanistan and authorise our forces to engage them," Thornberry said in a statement.

"In fact, the committee understands that our military made two requests last year to combat this emerging ISIS threat, the first dating back to February 2015. Once again, the President's inaction and denial of the ISIS threat has only resulted in its growth and put our troops and our Afghan partners at greater risk."

related articles
Russell Moore compares Donald Trump to the \'golden calf\' in the Bible that Israelites wrongly worshipped
Russell Moore compares Donald Trump to the 'golden calf' in the Bible that Israelites wrongly worshipped

Russell Moore compares Donald Trump to the 'golden calf' in the Bible that Israelites wrongly worshipped

Secularism in France needs overhaul to combat radicalisation, warns education minister
Secularism in France needs overhaul to combat radicalisation, warns education minister

Secularism in France needs overhaul to combat radicalisation, warns education minister

Tajikistan shaves 13,000 men\'s beards in fight against radicalism
Tajikistan shaves 13,000 men's beards in fight against radicalism

Tajikistan shaves 13,000 men's beards in fight against radicalism

News
Finnish church used AI to conduct a worship service but it didn't feel the same
Finnish church used AI to conduct a worship service but it didn't feel the same

From Gutenberg and his printing press to The Salvation Army and the first motion picture, the Church has a long tradition of using new technology to spread the Gospel. Now, a congregation in Finland has taken the next step on this journey, using AI tools to organise and conduct a worship service.

First complete Chinese translation of the Bible sells at auction for £56,000
First complete Chinese translation of the Bible sells at auction for £56,000

The first complete Chinese version of the Bible has sold at auction for over £56,000

Canterbury Cathedral welcomes more modern-day pilgrims
Canterbury Cathedral welcomes more modern-day pilgrims

Canterbury Cathedral is hoping to offer "sanctuary and hope" to modern day pilgrims

Should Christians be more critical of Israel?
Should Christians be more critical of Israel?

Why do Christians support Israel and should there be limits to that support?