US immigration row: Court wants detained moms and kids freed, but DOJ files appeal

A US Border Patrol vehicle drives by the 18-foot high rusty steel barrier along the US-Mexico border at sunset in Brownsville, Texas, on Sept. 2, 2014. Reuters

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed an appeal to ask a court to reverse its ruling last month that would pave way for the release of detained immigrant mothers and children who entered the US border illegally and held at family detention facilities.

On July 24, US District Judge Dolly Gee of the Central District of California ruled that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) breached the Flores settlement agreement of 1997, which required juveniles to be released from custody without delay to a parent, legal guardian and adult relative among others.

In its filing, the DOJ said the policies that the court construed as imposing "blanket" detention of female-headed families have been eliminated and the length of detention has been shortened.

It said the family facilities are being transformed into DHS processing centres that can "efficiently process families; conduct health screenings and provide immunisations; preliminarily assess whether family members are eligible to apply for relief or protection to remain in the United States; facilitate access to counsel and legal orientation programs; and release those found eligible to apply for relief or protection within an average of approximately 20 days."

The DOJ warned that if the court order is implemented, the DHS will be required to release all families seeking to illegally enter the US "if their removal takes longer than three to five days to execute" and "even if they possess no legitimate claims for relief or protection from removal."

The court order, the DOJ said, "could undo the progress that has been achieved in reducing the number of families illegally crossing the Southwest border since the summer of 2014."

It said the proposed remedies by the court "could heighten the risk of another surge in illegal migration across our Southwest border by Central American families."

It said DHS' new policies, which were never covered by the court ruling, allow majority of individuals in family facilities to stay there only during the relatively short time needed for essential processing.

Among families booked into a family facility from June 28 to July 11, 2015, it said, more than 60 percent had been released or removed by July 29 or within two to four weeks compared to the last six months in 2014 where only 21 percent were released or removed within 30 days.

According to the filing, in 2014, the number of family members, or children encountered with a parent or legal guardian, apprehended increased by 361 percent to 68,445. This year, the Border Patrol has apprehended 24,901 family members, a 55 percent decrease from the previous year.

With the court ruling, Democrats and immigration activists have revived calls to shut down family detention facilities, according to Politico.

Democratic presidential bet Hillary Clinton has criticised the policy.

Nearly all members of the House Democratic Caucus have signed a letter to end family detention.

"In light of this recent federal court ruling, we urge you to take all necessary and appropriate steps to bring the Department's practices in line with the settlement agreement and the recent court ruling," the House Democrats said.

related articles
Killing of another American by illegal immigrants blamed on US authorities
Killing of another American by illegal immigrants blamed on US authorities

Killing of another American by illegal immigrants blamed on US authorities

Illegal immigrants now number 2.5 million under Obama rule; 400,000 arriving yearly
Illegal immigrants now number 2.5 million under Obama rule; 400,000 arriving yearly

Illegal immigrants now number 2.5 million under Obama rule; 400,000 arriving yearly

US House bucks White House threat, OKs bill cracking down on \'sanctuary cities\'
US House bucks White House threat, OKs bill cracking down on 'sanctuary cities'

US House bucks White House threat, OKs bill cracking down on 'sanctuary cities'

Obama administration plans to expand waiver policy on illegal immigrants
Obama administration plans to expand waiver policy on illegal immigrants

Obama administration plans to expand waiver policy on illegal immigrants

Decorated sheriff accuses President Obama of apathy in enforcing immigration laws
Decorated sheriff accuses President Obama of apathy in enforcing immigration laws

Decorated sheriff accuses President Obama of apathy in enforcing immigration laws

US accused of poorly treating women and children in immigration detention centres
US accused of poorly treating women and children in immigration detention centres

US accused of poorly treating women and children in immigration detention centres

News
Dozens of Scottish church leaders warn against legalising assisted suicide
Dozens of Scottish church leaders warn against legalising assisted suicide

Pastors and Christian leaders across Scotland have signed an open letter to MSPs urging them to vote against a draft bill that seeks to legalise assisted suicide. 

Sequel to hit Christian movie 'I Can Only Imagine' gets new release date
Sequel to hit Christian movie 'I Can Only Imagine' gets new release date

The release date for the faith-based film “I Can Only Imagine 2,” the sequel to the 2018 box office hit, is moving from March 20, 2026, to Feb. 20, 2026, Lionsgate and Kingdom Story Company have announced.

First Minister John Swinney among MSPs to vote against Scottish assisted dying bill
First Minister John Swinney among MSPs to vote against Scottish assisted dying bill

Scotland’s First Minister, John Swinney, has confirmed he will vote against the controversial Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, ahead of its pivotal Stage 1 vote set for Tuesday evening. 

Suicide is a sin - why can't we say so?
Suicide is a sin - why can't we say so?

It might just be me, but amongst all the myriad and somewhat valid objections raised, including by Christians, to "Assisted Dying" (read "Doctors Killing Patients" or "Doctors Helping Patients to Kill Themselves"), I haven't really seen the most important, indeed the all-decisive, one.